Over recent weeks there
seems to have been renewed interest in the so-called “second
question” or “third option” on the 2014 independence
referendum, at least among the chattering classes. The “Better No”
campaign and the separate (but strikingly similar) political parties
which form its membership have become increasingly loud in their
opposition to the very idea of devo max, and to its inclusion as an
option on the referendum ballot paper.
Over the first half of
this year, there has also been an attempt by many to define the
possible types of devolution which might be on offer. I even had
a wee go myself a few weeks ago. The options seem to range from
Calman plus, through Devo Plus to Devo Max or Full Fiscal Autonomy,
with the Lib Dems muddying the water with talk of finalising their
federalist proposals after a century of dithering.
All of these proposals,
however, share a single underlying template, no matter how much they
may differ in detail or scope. That is, they all involve the
continuation of the UK state, with Westminster at its hub, and some
power/responsibilities/revenues being devolved (and by their very
nature of devolution, devolved temporarily) from Westminster to
Holyrood.
Because of this, none
of the models so far proposed is particularly radical, and it is not
surprising that they should be a little uninspiring as a consequence.
They also share the common factor that, beyond the extremely limited
shift of powers contained in the recent Scotland bill which will
become the status quo by 2015 if Scotland votes No, none of them is
capable of being enacted, even if supported by a majority of the
Scottish electorate.
This is because each of
them requires a majority of UK MPs to vote in favour of their
implementation, since devolution is entirely in their gift, and those
MPs are extremely unlikely to do so. This will be particularly true
in the aftermath of a No vote, which would be seen by MPs as a defeat
for the SNP and for the wider independence movement, making them even
less sympathetic to the concept of extended powers for the Scots.
In addition, almost all
MPs represent English constituencies and even our own Scottish cohort
include some of the most vehement opponents of further devolution. No
political party, the SNP included, holds a mandate to implement devo
anything at all, nor do they appear to have the political will to
acquire such a mandate. How then, in the unthinkable event of a no
vote, do we ensure that the devolution experiment does not stagnate
and die?
Let me suggest the
following solution.
There is a growing
voice within England for the establishment of an English parliament.
The democratic deficit which was so evident in Scotland, and which
remains to this day, is now becoming visible south of the border,
particularly in relation to the infamous “West Lothian question”.
This question is not, as you might suppose, “What is Westminster
doing to help keep Halls of Broxburn going?”, but rather, “Why
can Scottish MPs vote on English issues when English MPs can't
reciprocate?”
The bitterness evident
among English MPs has been compounded by the increasing gulf between
the quality of public services offered on both sides of the border,
particularly since the SNP took over the Scottish Government in may
2007. This has led to louder cries of “subsidy junkies” and a
general belief that Scots are being given a superior level of service
at the expense of their over-taxed English neighbours.
My proposal, therefore,
is that we lobby for a temporary rearrangement of UK government and
parliamentary affairs, as a sort of educational experiment.
For a limited period,
say a decade beginning in 2015, the UK parliament would move to the
Western Isles. After all, Stornoway is in a similar geographic position in
relation to most of England as London is in respect to the bulk of
Scotland, so this location would seem fair. Additionally, the Hebrides could
do with the jobs.
The bulk of civil
service jobs would need to move as well, with a great many local
candidates being used to fill the gaps left by those who choose not
to relocate. As a nod to modernism, some of those posts could be
located in Harris or even as far away as the Uists, Barra and
Benbecula. Obviously the local communications network would require an
upgrade, on the model used to accommodate the Olympics, perhaps.
Proceeds from the
residual financial sector in South-Eastern England would be used to
build a motorway network between Inverness and Ulapool, and from Ness
to Barra. A bypass would be needed around Stornoway itself, so the
Barvas Orbital Motorway would be built. The CalMac ferry service to
Ulapool would be augmented by a tunnel, le tunnel sous la Minch,
connecting Inverness to Arnish by high speed rail link.
The internal structure
of the parliament would need to change, of course. 9/10 of MLPs
(Members of the Lewis Parliament) would represent Scottish seats,
with about half of their constituencies being located in the Hebrides
and Northern Isles. A second parliament would need to be constructed
in Barra to accommodate the House of Lords of the Isles.
The criterion for
membership of this second house would be a highland accent and
ownership of a Hebridean croft. Naturally, 30 or so Free Church
ministers would be members by right, to ensure that late night
sittings on a Saturday evening did not inadvertently overrun.
The Royal family would
be rehoused in Kisimul castle, and all tourist flights rerouted to
Barra airport. Sand would be imported from Luskentyre to build a
second runway in order to cope with the increased traffic. A new
gate, to be known as “Angus MacNeil International Airport - Terminal 2, will stop
sheep from invading the air strip. It is expected that queues at
terminal 2 will be considerably shorter than has been the case at
Heathrow.
The Westminster
parliament would continue, under its new title of English
Administrative Executive Assembly, and would be responsible for
selected English-only affairs, upon which people with Scottish
accents or wearing tartan of any form would have no right to vote.
These responsibilities would include cricket, morris dancing, the
upkeep of both Hadrian's wall and the Thames submarine base and the privatisation of public services.
It would receive a
block grant from Stornoway to help with its costs, with all income
generated in England being surrendered to the Finance Department of
the Comhairle nan Eilean Siar.
I am now accepting
wagers on the precise number of months into the 10 year term of the
Lewis parliament that demands for English independence become audible
from the standing stones of Carloway, even over the traffic noise from the Barvas Orbital Mororway.
Bob Duncan
Bob Duncan
The West Lothian Question is a dead issue for a number of reasons.
ReplyDelete1. Removing the ability for Scottish (and NI MPs by extension) to vote on English/Wales matters creates a two-tier system of representatives. Should Scottish MPs be paid less? Does it strengthen the argument for Scottish independence?
2. 'English votes for English laws' is a tidy slogan that is currently utterly unenforceable. Many areas of England have been offered different degrees of devolution- the North East declined with a huge majority the formation of an Assembly to represent them. More recently only 1/10 cities voted for a Mayor to deal with city issues much like the London Mayor currently does.
3. Around 80% of the English see their nationality as synonymous with British (far higher than Scotland). They see the Westminster Parliament as their own (why wouldn't they, it was the English parliament before 1707 after all). So are unwilling to create a 2nd tier parliament outwith Westminster that would have lesser powers.
I find your take entertaining- I'm all for putting the British Parliament somewhere up very North for a while. Perhaps we can revert the camera angle on BBC news and weather to look down towards the South rather than up to the North to show the changes in political power.
I find it immensely irritating when the calls for 'English votes', 'English laws' or any complaint made about 'how easy the Scots get it' is made, by either parliamentarian or English public. There are simple answers to their problems, but unless they actually vote for it, they should simply not waste their breath.
Why stop at 10 years? They've had 300-odd years of a go at it, Only fair for the same term to apply up here. :-)
ReplyDeletehttp://i51.photobucket.com/albums/f390/chicmac/beebweathermap.jpg
ReplyDeleteYou forgot to add that the nuclear "deterrence" would be based in the Thames.
ReplyDeleteOmission corrected, thanks for the tip.
DeleteIndependence solves The West Lothian Question... I think
ReplyDelete